gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption archive

390 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Re: "Winning" the pair programming discussion
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:19:59 -0800
Dale Emery <[email protected]> • #780
Re: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:09:25 -0500
Jim Standley <[email protected]> • #779
Re: "Winning" the pair programming discussion
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:08:12 -0000
"banshee858 <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #778
Re: "Winning" the pair programming discussion
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:57:34 -0800
Dale Emery <[email protected]> • #777
Re: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:34:41 -0800
Dale Emery <[email protected]> • #776
"Winning" the pair programming discussion
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:10:35 -0000
"banshee858 <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #775
Re: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:00:35 -0800
Dale Emery <[email protected]> • #774
RE: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:30:53 -0700
"Steve Ropa" <[email protected]> • #773
Re: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:36:49 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #772
RE: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:23:52 -0700
"Steve Ropa" <[email protected]> • #771
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:10:21 -0000
"Dale Emery <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #770
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sun, 09 Feb 2003 17:22:46 -0500
Jim Standley <[email protected]> • #769
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 06:00:28 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #768
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:58:43 +0800
<[email protected]> • #767
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:51:19 +0800
<[email protected]> • #766
RE: Some words on who to talk to about new paradigms...
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:53:51 -0500
"Kay A. Pentecost" <[email protected]> • #765
Re: Some words on who to talk to about new paradigms...
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 05:45:22 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #764
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Fri, 07 Feb 2003 21:17:06 -0500
Jim Standley <[email protected]> • #763
Some words on who to talk to about new paradigms...
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:07:26 -0500
"Kay A. Pentecost" <[email protected]> • #762
Re: XP List Down?
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:11:15 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #761
XP List Down?
Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:56:04 -0000
"Dave Rooney <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #760
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 04:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Sandy <[email protected]> • #759
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Thu, 06 Feb 2003 22:14:56 +1300
Ian Collins <[email protected]> • #758
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 04:06:53 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #757
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 04:05:59 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #756
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Thu, 06 Feb 2003 22:01:44 +1300
Ian Collins <[email protected]> • #755
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
05 Feb 2003 23:38:28 -0800
William Pietri <[email protected]> • #754
Re: More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:46:04 +1300
Ian Collins <[email protected]> • #753
More on converting a team to XP/TDD ...
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Sandy <[email protected]> • #752
RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:55:58 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #751
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:38:58 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #750
RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:29:08 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #749
RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:40:10 -0800
"Dan Rawsthorne" <[email protected]> • #748
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:31:19 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #747
RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:29:55 -0800
"Dan Rawsthorne" <[email protected]> • #746
six-sigma redux
Mon, 03 Feb 2003 18:09:48 -0500
George Dinwiddie <[email protected]> • #745
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:10:51 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #744
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sun, 2 Feb 2003 13:14:04 -0600
"Bill Walton" <[email protected]> • #743
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sat, 1 Feb 2003 22:40:50 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #742
RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sat, 1 Feb 2003 15:46:40 -0700
"Glen B. Alleman" <[email protected]> • #741
Fw: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sat, 1 Feb 2003 15:01:48 -0600
"Bill Walton" <[email protected]> • #740
Re: TDD and database GUIs
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:49:14 +0000
Patrick O'Beirne <[email protected]> • #739
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know a
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:30:58 -0000
"Scott Worley <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #738
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know a
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:30:10 -0000
"Scott Worley <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #737
Re: "I've tried it" doesn't instill interest
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:59:49 -0500
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]> • #736
RE: agile & extreme
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:53:24 -0500
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]> • #735
Re: Re: "I've tried it" doesn't instill interest
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:46:32 -0500
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]> • #734
Re: "I've tried it" doesn't instill interest
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:43:12 -0500
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]> • #733
Who is the Customer? (RE: Lack of end-user interest (was RE: Re: Customers who can't take small releases))
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:35:31 -0500
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]> • #732
RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:46:09 -0500
Jim Standley <[email protected]> • #731
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 17:40:17 -0600
pat brenner <[email protected]> • #730
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:54:26 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #729
Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 04:50:55 -0800 (PST)
Sandy <[email protected]> • #728
Re: TDD and database GUIs
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:17:43 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #727
TDD and database GUIs
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:58:19 +0000
Patrick O'Beirne <[email protected]> • #726
RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Sun, 26 Jan 2003 22:52:21 -0500
"Dave Rooney" <[email protected]> • #725
Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 03:43:55 -0000
"Scott Worley <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #724
Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 03:43:51 -0000
"Scott Worley <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #723
RE: Stats on benefits of XP ...
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:01:50 -0800 (PST)
Sandy <[email protected]> • #722
RE: Stats on benefits of XP ...
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:51:52 +1100
"Philip Haselden" <[email protected]> • #721
Stats on benefits of XP ...
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Sandy <[email protected]> • #720
Re: Back to one's roots
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:56:52 -0500
Bill Tozier <[email protected]> • #719
Re: Back to one's roots
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:24:47 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #718
Re: Back to one's roots
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:13:56 -0000
"Dale Emery <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #717
Re: Re: Back to one's roots
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:58:21 -0500
Bill Tozier <[email protected]> • #716
Re: Back to one's roots
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:47:11 -0000
"Dale Emery <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #715
Re: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Programming
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:00:35 +0000
Bryce Kampjes <[email protected]> • #714
Back to one's roots
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:39:20 -0500
Bill Tozier <[email protected]> • #713
Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:33:55 -0500
George Dinwiddie <[email protected]> • #712
Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:41:14 -0000
"Dave Hoover <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #711
Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:29:26 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #710
RE: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:14:50 -0500
"Kay A. Pentecost" <[email protected]> • #709
RE: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:14:48 -0500
"Kay A. Pentecost" <[email protected]> • #708
RE: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:14:47 -0500
"Kay A. Pentecost" <[email protected]> • #707
RE: Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:14:46 -0500
"Kay A. Pentecost" <[email protected]> • #706
Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 23:27:11 -0500
George Dinwiddie <[email protected]> • #705
Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:25:20 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #704
Re: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Programming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:19:12 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #703
RE: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Programming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:05:58 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #702
Re: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Programming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:50:04 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #701
RE: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Programming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:46:02 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #700
Re: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Programming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:33:21 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #699
Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:23:43 +1300
Ian Collins <[email protected]> • #698
RE: Managing Extreme Programming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:33:32 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #697
RE: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Programming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:25:55 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #696
Re: Successfully introducing TDD
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:48:07 -0000
"Dave Hoover <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> • #695
Successfully introducing TDD
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:49:44 -0500
"Kay A. Pentecost" <[email protected]> • #694
RE: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Progr amming
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:46:32 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #693
RE: Managing Extreme Programming
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:39:44 -0700
"Alleman, Glen B." <[email protected]> • #692
RE: Re: OT - poor word choice re: Managing Extreme Progr amming
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:59:38 -0700
"Steve Ropa" <[email protected]> • #691
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.