gmane.games.bridge.laws archive

623 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: In between Law 23
Sun, 5 Nov 2017 02:20:28 +1000
"Jan Peach" <[email protected]> • #66744
Re: In between Law 23
Sat, 4 Nov 2017 10:53:50 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66743
Re: In between Law 23
Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:21:39 +0100
Volker Walther <[email protected]> • #66742
Re: In between Law 23
Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:21:27 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66741
Re: In between Law 23
Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:21 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66740
In between Law 23
Fri, 3 Nov 2017 02:19:42 +0100
Volker Walther <[email protected]> • #66739
Re: subject now becoming clearer
Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:38:26 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66738
Re: subject now becoming clearer
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 18:08:40 +0000
Stefanie Rohan <[email protected]> • #66737
Re: subject now becoming clearer
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:57:43 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66736
Re: subject now becoming clearer
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:57:42 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66735
Re: subject now becoming clearer
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:51:47 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66734
Re: subject now becoming clearer
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 21:49:37 +0000
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> • #66733
Re: subject now becoming clearer
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 16:14:27 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66732
subject now becoming clearer
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 20:44:26 +0100
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66731
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 10:49:21 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66730
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:18:47 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66729
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 23:36:51 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66728
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:17:08 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66727
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:30:21 -0500
Jerry Fusselman <[email protected]> • #66726
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:21:56 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66725
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:01:03 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66724
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:07:14 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66723
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 08:12:02 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66722
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:06:47 +0800
Bill Kemp <[email protected]> • #66721
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:54:11 +1100
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]> • #66720
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:44:50 -0500
Jerry Fusselman <[email protected]> • #66719
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:38:09 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66718
Re: subject will become clearer afterwards
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:37:04 +0100
"Rui Lopes Marques" <[email protected]> • #66717
subject will become clearer afterwards
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:16:04 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66716
Re: How careless is careless?
Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:40:54 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66715
Re: How careless is careless?
Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:48:38 +1100
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66714
Re: How careless is careless?
Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:48:33 +1000
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]> • #66713
Re: How careless is careless?
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:41:31 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66712
Re: How careless is careless?
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:15:10 -0400
David Grabiner <[email protected]> • #66711
Re: How careless is careless?
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:43:10 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66710
Re: How careless is careless?
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:36:00 +0200
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> • #66709
How careless is careless?
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:42:12 +1000
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]> • #66708
Re: inn err Ni manor
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:48:16 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66707
Re: inn err Ni manor
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:36:10 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66706
Re: Dummy's rights
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:11:03 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66705
Re: inn err Ni manor
Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:58:14 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66704
Re: Dummy's rights
Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:21:33 +0800
Bill Kemp <[email protected]> • #66703
Re: inn err Ni manor
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 11:26:38 +0800
"Bill Kemp" <[email protected]> • #66702
Re: Dummy's rights
Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:36:34 +0200
Volker Walther <[email protected]> • #66701
Re: Dummy's rights
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:58:49 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66700
Re: Dummy's rights
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:02:32 +0200
"Peter Eidt" <[email protected]> • #66699
Dummy's rights
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:49:33 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66698
Law 46
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:00:33 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66697
Re: inn err Ni manor
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:51:02 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66696
Re: inn err Ni manor
Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:50:46 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66695
Re: inn err Ni manor
Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:45:55 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66694
Re: inn err Ni manor
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:28:52 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66693
Re: inn err Ni manor
Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:47:54 -0400
brian <[email protected]> • #66692
Re: inn err Ni manor
Sun, 03 Sep 2017 13:53:51 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66691
Re: inn err Ni manor
Sun, 3 Sep 2017 01:47:58 -0400
brian <[email protected]> • #66690
Re: inn err Ni manor
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 15:23:50 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66689
Re: inn err Ni manor
Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:17:32 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66688
Re: inn err Ni manor
Fri, 1 Sep 2017 18:59:02 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66687
inn err Ni manor
Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:46:49 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66686
Re: Two questions
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:42:59 +0200
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> • #66685
Re: Two questions
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:37:09 +0200 (CEST)
ROCAFORT Jean-Pierre <[email protected]> • #66684
Re: Two questions
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:54:18 -0700
"Tom Ciacio" <[email protected]> • #66683
Two questions
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:36:52 +0200
Jeff Easterson <[email protected]> • #66682
Re: 2017 Law 26 (Call Withdrawn, Lead Restrictions)
Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:24:16 -0400
Steve Willner <[email protected]> • #66681
Re: 2017 Law 26 (Call Withdrawn, Lead Restrictions)
Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:41:01 +0100
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> • #66680
Re: 2017 Law 26 (Call Withdrawn, Lead Restrictions)
Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:38:46 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66679
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:45:26 +0200
Volker Walther <[email protected]> • #66678
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:46:24 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66677
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:17:11 -0400
Robert Park <[email protected]> • #66676
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:17:34 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66675
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:47:25 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66674
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:27:00 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66673
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:33:21 +0100
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> • #66672
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:10:01 +0100
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> • #66671
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:37:41 +1000
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]> • #66670
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 23:46:21 +0200
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> • #66669
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:03:25 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66668
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 19:20:39 -0400
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]> • #66667
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:34:21 +0100
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> • #66666
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:31:30 +0000 (GMT)
Vigfús Pálsson <[email protected]> • #66665
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:21:27 +0000
Roger Pewick <[email protected]> • #66664
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 02:39:35 -0700
Bruce Crossman <[email protected]> • #66663
Re: Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:46:27 +0200
Herman De Wael <[email protected]> • #66662
Jeeves the Butler
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:26:21 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66661
2017 Law 65B3
Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:46:07 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66660
Re: 2017 Law 26 (Call Withdrawn, Lead Restrictions)
Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:43:35 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66659
Re: 2017 Law 26 (Call Withdrawn, Lead Restrictions)
Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:16:10 +0200
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> • #66658
2017 Law 26 (Call Withdrawn, Lead Restrictions)
Mon, 5 Jun 2017 16:15:40 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66657
Re: Definition of Dummy
Fri, 26 May 2017 17:57:39 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66656
Re: Definition of Dummy
Thu, 25 May 2017 10:32:52 +0200
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> • #66655
Re: Definition of Dummy
Thu, 25 May 2017 09:31:56 +1000
"Jan Peach" <[email protected]> • #66654
Re: Definition of Dummy
Thu, 25 May 2017 00:51:01 +0200
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> • #66653
Re: Definition of Dummy
Thu, 25 May 2017 07:31:28 +1000
"Jan Peach" <[email protected]> • #66652
Definition of Dummy
Wed, 24 May 2017 16:56:44 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66651
Re: Laws 2017: erroneous & mistaken
Wed, 24 May 2017 14:01:30 +1000
Richard Hills <[email protected]> • #66650
Re: Fwd: Re: request for delay of deadline for implementing new Laws
Fri, 19 May 2017 17:18:00 +0900
Robert Geller <[email protected]> • #66649
Fwd: Re: request for delay of deadline for implementing new Laws
Fri, 19 May 2017 16:03:49 +0900
Robert Geller <[email protected]> • #66648
2017Laws of Duplicate bridge
Fri, 5 May 2017 00:00:02 +0530
BridgeinIndia <[email protected]> • #66647
Re: Duplicate bridge laws 2017
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:34:34 +0530
BridgeinIndia <[email protected]> • #66646
Re: Duplicate bridge laws 2017
Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:13:48 -0500
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> • #66645
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.