gmane.linux.suse.domino archive
995 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 10). Latest articles →
Re: console output with 6.5.3
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:04:12 +0100Re: console output with 6.5.3
Thu, 04 Nov 2004 22:10:42 +0100Re: console output with 6.5.3
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:47:35 +0000console output with 6.5.3
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:06:46 +0100Re: JVM Problem - Installing Domini 6.5 on Suse 9.0
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:19:42 +0100Re: Domino 5.0.12 sporadically cuts off all clients - but reads a whole 4Gig database internally
Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:25:48 +0100Domino 5.0.12 sporadically cuts off all clients - but reads a whole 4Gig database internally
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:18:12 +0100Re: SLES8 and R5 with domrun: domino.input not working?
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:22:21 +0100Domino Install Error on SLES 9
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:42:17 -0400Re: SLES8 and R5 with domrun: domino.input not working?
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:12:42 +0200Fw: HTTP Stack, MTU And Fragmentation
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:48:14 +0200Re: HTTP Stack, MTU And Fragmentation [ScanMail found this email to be virus-free.]
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:32:57 +0200Re: HTTP Stack, MTU And Fragmentation
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:53:02 +0200HTTP Stack, MTU And Fragmentation
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:36:07 +0200SLES8 and R5 with domrun: domino.input not working?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:13:09 +0200Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] Running SLES 9 and Domino on x86?
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:51:21 +0200Re: Running SLES 9 and Domino on x86?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:50:07 -0500Re: Running SLES 9 and Domino on x86?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:02:31 +0200 (CEST)Re: Notes Client - enable compression before first login?
Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:59:21 +0200Notes Client - enable compression before first login?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:15:35 +0530 (IST)Re: Running SLES 9 and Domino on x86?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:13:52 +0530 (IST)Re: Reducing Network Traffic
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:05:34 +0200Re: (Beginer Question) Problems with Domino installation on SuSE
6 Oct 2004 14:56:41 +0200Reducing Network Traffic
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:17:57 +0530 (IST)Re: (Beginer Question) Problems with Domino installation on SuSE
Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:28:27 +0200Re: (Beginer Question) Problems with Domino installation on SuSE
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:27:58 +0100(Beginer Question) Problems with Domino installation on SuSE
5 Oct 2004 12:17:19 +0200Antwort: [suse-domino] Antwort: [suse-domino] Postfix to relay to Domino
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 07:49:39 +0200Re: public key not matching the one certified?
Sat, 2 Oct 2004 08:34:29 +0200public key not matching the one certified?
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:44:55 +0530 (IST)Re[2]: Postfix to relay to Domino
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:42:24 +0100Re: Postfix to relay to Domino
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:25:17 +0200Re[2]: Postfix to relay to Domino
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:21:48 +0100Antwort: [suse-domino] Postfix to relay to Domino
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:50:19 +0200Re: Postfix to relay to Domino
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:09:40 +0200Re: Unable To Bind To Port 6400
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:06:54 +0200Postfix to relay to Domino
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:55:35 +0200Re: Unable To Bind To Port 6400 [ScanMail found this email to be virus-free.]
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:47:45 +0200Unable To Bind To Port 6400
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:50:27 +0200Re: Antwort: [suse-domino] Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to new hardware
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:46:25 +0530 (IST)Re: Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to new hardware
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:04:54 +0200Antwort: [suse-domino] Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to new hardware
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:54:45 +0200Re: Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to new hardware
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:54:38 +0530 (IST)Re: Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to new hardware
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:16:14 +0200Re: Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to newhardware
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:13:22 -0400Re: Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to newhardware
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:36:31 +0530 (IST)Re: Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to new hardware
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:25:38 -0400Fatal Error signal = 0x0000000b while moving to new hardware
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:42:34 +0530 (IST)Re: Domino as a service
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:37:33 -0400Domino as a service
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:25:50 -0400Re: Suse 9.0 Domino Start/Stop-Script
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:38:25 -0400Betr.: [suse-domino] Re: Suse 9.0 Domino Start/Stop-Script
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:30:40 +0200Re: Suse 9.0 Domino Start/Stop-Script
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:09:19 +0200Suse 9.0 Domino Start/Stop-Script
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:17:39 +0200Re: Re: Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:43:55 +0200Re: Limiting number of server connections
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:50:16 +0200Re: Suse 9.0 and Domino 6.02CF1 Upgrade to 6.51 IF1
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:48:31 +0200 (CEST)Re: Limiting number of server connections
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 10:37:24 +0200Re: Limiting number of server connections
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:13:25 -0400Re: Limiting number of server connections
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:49:26 +0200Limiting number of server connections
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:45:15 -0400Re: Domino on SuSE 9.1 64-bit version ? ?
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 08:16:37 +0200Domino on SuSE 9.1 64-bit version ? ?
Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:06:37 +0800Suse 9.0 and Domino 6.02CF1 Upgrade to 6.51 IF1
Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:42:48 +1000Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:14:22 +0200Re: SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:01:04 +0200Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] Re: Re: Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2 [auf Viren überprüft]
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:06:50 +0200Re: [suse-domino] Re: Re: Antwo rt: Re: [suse-domino] SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2 [auf Viren überprüft ]
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:31:19 +0200Re: Re: Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:29:27 +0200Re: Domino 6.5.1 on Suse Linux STD SVR 8.0 Student
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:00:15 -0200Re: Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:16:52 +0200Antwort: Re: [suse-domino] SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:16:44 +0200Re: SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:41:39 +0200Re: Domino 6.5.1 on Suse Linux STD SVR 8.0 Student
Sat, 24 Jul 2004 13:42:49 +0200Re: Domino 6.5.1 on Suse Linux STD SVR 8.0 Student
Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:54:03 +0200Re: SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Sat, 24 Jul 2004 01:16:57 +0200Domino 6.5.1 on Suse Linux STD SVR 8.0 Student
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:54:01 -0400SuSE 9.1 Pro mit Domino 6.5.2
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:04:16 +0200Re: domino admin in wine
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:38:53 +0200 (CEST)Re[2]: domino admin in wine
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:36:52 +0100Re: domino admin in wine
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:24:33 +0200 (CEST)Re: domino admin in wine
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:16:03 +0200 (CEST)Antwort: [suse-domino] domino admin in wine
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:15:49 +0200Re: domino admin in wine
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:10:28 +0200Re: Domino on SUSE Setup Help (Instructions)
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:48:54 -0400Domino on SUSE Setup Help (Instructions)
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:03:41 -0400Re: domino admin in wine
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:18:14 +0100Re: domino admin in wine
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:54:41 -0200Re: domino admin in wine
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:49:58 +0200domino admin in wine
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:31:57 +0200 (CEST)Re: Just got my Notes 6.5 Client Up - Dll list to copy over
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:40:59 +0200 (CEST)Re: Just got my Notes 6.5 Client Up - Dll list to copy over
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:33:32 +0200 (CEST)Re: Just got my Notes 6.5 Client Up - Dll list to copy over
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:56:30 +0200Re: Just got my Notes 6.5 Client Up - Dll list to copy over
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:20:33 +0200 (CEST)Re: Just got my Notes 6.5 Client Up - Dll list to copy over
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:37:35 +0200Re: Just got my Notes 6.5 Client Up - Dll list to copy over
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:01:23 +0200 (CEST)Re: domino6 auf SLES7
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:47:43 +0200 (CEST)Re: domino6 auf SLES7
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:59:47 -0400domino6 auf SLES7
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:08:48 +0200 (MEST)Re: Just got my Notes 6.5 Client Up - Dll list to copy over
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:28:15 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.