gmane.ietf.asrg.rmx archive

288 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 3). Latest articles →

Re: Alternate bookkeeping proposal (MVP)
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:14:50 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #103
delineating DRIP
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:05:16 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #102
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:17:37 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #101
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:03:13 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #100
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:16:26 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #99
RE: Alternate bookkeeping proposal (MVP)
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:56:16 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #98
RE: design specifics --- the config label
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:51:09 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #97
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:40:47 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #96
Alternate bookkeeping proposal (MVP) [was: design specifics --- the config label]
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:12:46 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #95
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 07:44:35 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #94
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:50:34 -0400
Richard Rognlie <[email protected]> • #93
RE: sender rewriting scheme
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:07:12 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #92
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:04:46 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #91
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:02:11 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #90
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:53:44 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #89
Re: applicability statement vs technical specification
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:47:54 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #88
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:43:04 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #87
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:36:53 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #86
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:55:54 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #85
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:48:55 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #84
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:18:29 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #83
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:06:24 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #82
Re: Issues page has been updated
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:56:10 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #81
Re: applicability statement vs technical specification
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:34:53 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #80
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:07:47 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #79
Re: HELO/EHLO and applicability statement
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:01:44 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #78
Re: HELO/EHLO and applicability statement
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 08:50:19 -0400
Richard Rognlie <[email protected]> • #77
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:15:38 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #76
Re: design specifics --- the config label
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:37:36 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #75
Re: HELO/EHLO and applicability statement
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:26:00 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #74
RE: sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:04:55 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #73
RE: spf on slashdot
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:57:38 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #72
design specifics --- the config label
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:26:22 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #71
Re: Address to DNS mapping
Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:54:47 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #70
Re: HELO/EHLO and applicability statement
Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:19:41 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #69
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:51:48 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #68
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:31:50 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #67
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:09:36 +0200
Brad Knowles <[email protected]> • #66
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:11:12 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #65
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:00:10 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #64
Re: sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 20:47:40 +0200
Brad Knowles <[email protected]> • #63
sender rewriting scheme
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:28:25 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #62
spf on slashdot
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 00:15:13 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #61
Re: applicability statement vs technical specification
Sun, 05 Oct 2003 18:16:02 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #60
Re: applicability statement vs technical specification
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:18:25 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #59
Re: applicability statement vs technical specification
Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:09:52 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #58
Re: applicability statement vs technical specification
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:29:08 +0200
Brad Knowles <[email protected]> • #57
applicability statement vs technical specification
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 12:35:16 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #56
Issues page has been updated
Sun, 05 Oct 2003 12:12:41 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #55
RMX+SPF melt
Sat, 4 Oct 2003 22:09:47 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #54
SPF answers to the standard list of questions
Sat, 4 Oct 2003 14:56:18 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Introduction
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:41:21 +0200
Brad Knowles <[email protected]> • #52
Introduction
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:10:06 -0400
David Green <[email protected]> • #51
Re: The gap
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:28:15 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #50
HELO/EHLO and applicability statement
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:45:54 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #49
Re: Melting proposals together
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:31:59 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #48
RE: Address to DNS mapping
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:49:58 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #47
RE: The gap
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:36:16 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #46
Summary of responses to issues
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:56:38 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #45
Re: The gap
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:49:14 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #44
Re: Melting proposals together
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:49:10 -0400
Richard Rognlie <[email protected]> • #43
Address to DNS mapping
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:44:02 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #42
Melting proposals together
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:34:15 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #41
The gap
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:11:12 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #40
Re: Anti-introduction...
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:51:01 +0200
Brad Knowles <[email protected]> • #39
(RMX) Re: Scope, and a preliminary list of issues
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:35:58 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #38
RE: Question on new subscriber
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:58:20 -0400
Paul Judge <[email protected]> • #37
Re: Anti-introduction...
Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:48:43 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #36
Anti-introduction...
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 03:13:00 +0200
Brad Knowles <[email protected]> • #35
Re: Scope, and a preliminary list of issues
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:31:01 -0400
Richard Rognlie <[email protected]> • #34
RE: Scope, and a preliminary list of issues
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 18:43:53 -0500
"Gordon Fecyk - Home" <[email protected]> • #33
Two obstacles to a consent framework.
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:12:10 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #32
Re: Question on new subscriber
Thu, 02 Oct 2003 12:36:36 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #31
Scope, and a preliminary list of issues
Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:57:40 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #30
Question on new subscriber
Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:34:11 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #29
Re: Introduction; SPF proposes a configuration layer
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:15:38 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #28
Re: Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:59:25 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #27
Re: Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:53:59 -0400
Richard Rognlie <[email protected]> • #26
Introduction & background
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:31:55 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #25
Re: Introduction; SPF proposes a configuration layer
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 20:08:17 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #24
Introduction; SPF proposes a configuration layer
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:57:08 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #23
Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:48:46 -0400
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #22
Welcome from Paul
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:26:46 -0400
Paul Judge <[email protected]> • #21
Welcome
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:56:26 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #20
Re: Welcome to the list, and initial references.
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:51:09 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #19
I'm Hadmut :-)
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:47:36 +0200
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #18
Introduction
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:14:42 -0400
Raymond S Brand <[email protected]> • #17
Welcome to the list, and initial references.
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:00:30 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #16
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.