gmane.ietf.provreg archive

1661 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 17). Latest articles →

Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:43:38 +0000
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #3187
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:19:56 -0500
Seth Goldman <[email protected]> • #3186
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:46:54 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3185
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:48:55 +0800
齐超 <[email protected]> • #3184
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:16:11 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #3183
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:01:28 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #3182
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:33:44 +0800
齐超 <[email protected]> • #3181
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:48:48 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3180
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:22:24 -0500
Seth Goldman <[email protected]> • #3179
Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:00:58 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3178
RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:36:48 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #3177
Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 12
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:55:47 +1100
Wil Tan <[email protected]> • #3176
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:08:22 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #3175
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:04:20 +0000
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #3174
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:55:07 +0100 (CET)
Maarten Bosteels <[email protected]> • #3173
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:37:49 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3172
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:20:51 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #3171
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:33:20 -0500
MICHAEL W YOUNG <[email protected]> • #3170
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:29:31 -0500
Seth Goldman <[email protected]> • #3169
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:16:40 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #3168
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:28:23 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3167
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:54:33 +0100
Jan Saell <[email protected]> • #3166
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-00.txt
Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:32:28 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3165
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:15:02 -0500
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #3164
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:38:25 -0500
MICHAEL W YOUNG <[email protected]> • #3163
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Mon, 04 Nov 2013 13:16:14 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3162
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:10:26 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #3161
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:31:08 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3160
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:08:37 -0400
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #3159
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:37:13 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3158
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:29:03 -0400
MICHAEL W YOUNG <[email protected]> • #3157
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:17:57 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3156
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:12:07 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3155
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:52:43 -0400
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #3154
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:05:06 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #3153
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:31:49 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #3152
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:00:40 +0000
Michele Neylon - Blacknight <[email protected]> • #3151
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:57:19 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3150
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:56:58 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3149
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:56:58 -0200
Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]> • #3148
Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:54:00 +0000
Michele Neylon - Blacknight <[email protected]> • #3147
Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:51:40 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #3146
Re: EPP Extensions Registry Draft and WG Charter Status
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:40:59 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3145
Re: EPP Extensions Registry Draft and WG Charter Status
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 04:42:32 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #3144
EPP Extensions Registry Draft and WG Charter Status
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:36:24 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3143
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:59:22 +0000
Marc Groeneweg <[email protected]> • #3142
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:32:44 +0200
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #3141
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:39:55 +0200
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #3140
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:25:21 +0200
Jan Saell <[email protected]> • #3139
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:49:15 +0200
Mark Elkins <[email protected]> • #3138
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:43:12 +0000
Stuart Olmstead-Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3137
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 04:27:37 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #3136
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:45:27 +0000
Stuart Olmstead-Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3135
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Wed, 9 Oct 2013 22:44:28 -0300
Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]> • #3134
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:41:10 +0000
Stuart Olmstead-Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3133
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:56:24 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #3132
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:01:26 +0200
Mark Elkins <[email protected]> • #3131
Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 18:10:05 +0200
Jan Saell <[email protected]> • #3130
Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:13:52 +0000
Stuart Olmstead-Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3129
Updated eppext Charter Proposal
Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:13:52 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3128
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:01:41 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3127
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:08:18 +0800
Ning Kong <[email protected]> • #3126
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:56:55 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3125
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:39:55 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3124
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:16:08 +0800
"Linlin Zhou" <[email protected]> • #3123
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:28:52 +0200
Peter Koch <[email protected]> • #3122
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 14:58:38 +0800 (CST)
"Jian Chen" <[email protected]> • #3121
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:43:56 +0800
Ning Kong <[email protected]> • #3120
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:24:32 +0200
Jan Saell <[email protected]> • #3119
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 08:40:43 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #3118
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 08:22:59 +0200
Jan Saell <[email protected]> • #3117
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 08:14:21 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #3116
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:53:29 +1200
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #3115
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:41:38 -0400
Stuart Olmstead-Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3114
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:27:59 -0400
MICHAEL YOUNG <[email protected]> • #3113
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:52:30 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #3112
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:59:40 -0400
MICHAEL YOUNG <[email protected]> • #3111
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:35 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3110
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:47:41 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #3109
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:41:33 +0200 (CEST)
Maarten Bosteels <[email protected]> • #3108
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:17:16 +0200
Jan Saell <[email protected]> • #3107
Verisign EPP SDK 1.1.0.4 and Launch EPP SDK 2.3.0.0
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:24:17 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #3106
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 20:19:39 +0200
Mike O'Connell <[email protected]> • #3105
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:27:47 -0700
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #3104
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:17:01 -0700
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #3103
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:24:42 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #3102
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:24:22 -0700
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #3101
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:17:24 -0700
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #3100
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:45:27 -0700
Gustavo Lozano <[email protected]> • #3099
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:34:55 +0200
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #3098
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:22:36 +0000
Michele Neylon - Blacknight <[email protected]> • #3097
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:45:22 +0200
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #3096
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:41:02 +0200
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #3095
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:35:17 +0200
"Marco Davids (SIDN)" <[email protected]> • #3094
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:35:03 +0200
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #3093
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:31:32 +0200
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #3092
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:36:57 +0200 (CEST)
Jarle Greipsland <[email protected]> • #3091
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:05:23 +0000
Michele Neylon - Blacknight <[email protected]> • #3090
Re: Proposed Charter for EPP Extensions (eppext) Working Group
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:54:06 +1200
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #3089
Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:37:25 -0400
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #3088
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.