gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general archive

380 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Watching for false positives (example)
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:25:42 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1262
Re: Spamprobe in scoring (was: qsf)
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:02:25 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1261
Re: Spamprobe in scoring (was: qsf)
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:56:39 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1260
Re: qsf
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:41:12 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1259
Re: Spamprobe in scoring (was: qsf)
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:25:16 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1258
Spamprobe in scoring (was: qsf)
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:15:36 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1257
Re: qsf
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:23:47 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1256
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:04:46 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1255
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:37:13 +0100
Christian Ebert <[email protected]> • #1254
qsf
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:51:30 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1253
Re: Inline image spams and "-o whitelist"
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:19:42 -0500
Chris Ross <[email protected]> • #1252
Re: Inline image spams and "-o whitelist"
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:56:37 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1251
Inline image spams and "-o whitelist"
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:46:27 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1250
Re: Spamprobe 1.4d - compilation error
Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:58:34 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1249
Re: Spamprobe 1.4d released
Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:50:40 +0100
Andrej Kacian <[email protected]> • #1248
Re: Spamprobe 1.4d - compilation error
Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:15:34 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1247
Spamprobe 1.4d - compilation error
Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:02:05 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1246
Re: Spamprobe 1.4d released
Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:07:19 +0100
Stefan Walter <[email protected]> • #1245
Re: Spamprobe 1.4d released
Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:44:05 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1244
Spamprobe 1.4d released
Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:18:50 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1243
gcc4.1 compatibility patch
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:03:35 +0100
Andrej Kacian <[email protected]> • #1242
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams - Compile error
Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:08:41 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1241
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams - Compile error
Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:02:31 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1240
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:51:27 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1239
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams - Compile error
Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:41:11 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1238
Re: Are you seeing these mailer bounces?
Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:25:51 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1237
Re: Are you seeing these mailer bounces?
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:50:14 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1236
Re: Are you seeing these mailer bounces?
Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:12:42 -0500
John Hinton <webmaster-VSu8CHwuV/[email protected]> • #1235
Re: Are you seeing these mailer bounces?
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:21:17 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1234
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 20:07:36 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1233
Are you seeing these mailer bounces?
Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:00:57 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1232
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:57:02 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1231
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:34:10 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1230
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:23:20 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1229
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:33:33 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1228
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:28:28 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1227
Re: 1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:10:23 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1226
1.4c and inline image spams
Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:48:32 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1225
Re: Timeout problem
Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:22:56 -0000
"Allan Stewart" <[email protected]> • #1224
Re: Timeout problem
Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:24:55 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1223
Re: Timeout problem
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:21:09 -0600
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1222
Timeout problem
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:11:52 -0000
"Allan Stewart" <[email protected]> • #1221
Re: experimental procmailrc for inline image filtering
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:43:19 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1220
Re: experimental procmailrc for inline image filtering
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:38:59 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1219
Missing procmailrc file...
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:37:25 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1218
experimental procmailrc for inline image filtering
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:35:07 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1217
Re: body_checks regex explained in detail Re: Inline image spams
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:07:48 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1216
More on catching inlines
Mon, 25 Dec 2006 10:55:34 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1215
Re: body_checks regex explained in detail Re: Inline image spams
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:02:34 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1214
Re: body_checks regex explained in detail Re: Inline image spams
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:39:26 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1213
Re: body_checks regex explained in detail Re: Inline image spams
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 15:27:20 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1212
body_checks regex explained in detail Re: Inline image spams
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:35:08 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1211
Re: Inline image spams
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:48:58 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1210
SpamProbe + ClamAV
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:40:00 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1209
Re: Greylisting
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:22:55 -0600
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1208
Greylisting
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:10:43 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1207
Re: Inline image spams
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:41:11 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1206
Re: Inline image spams
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:32:28 +0000
Charles Abell <charles-SIt0Kka/vc/[email protected]> • #1205
Re: Inline image spams
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:30:33 -0600
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1204
Re: caught runtime exception: No such file or
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:00:39 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1203
Inline image spams
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:57:33 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1202
Re: caught runtime exception: No such file or
Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:35:39 +0100
Andrea Ganduglia <[email protected]> • #1201
caught runtime exception: No such file or directory
Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:38:05 +0100
Andrea Ganduglia <[email protected]> • #1200
Seeking help on anti-spam project
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 14:08:48 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1199
Re: Why is this type of spam not caught?
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:11:21 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1198
Re: Why is this type of spam not caught?
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:15:36 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1197
Re: Why is this type of spam not caught?
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:20:48 +0100
"Matthias B." <[email protected]> • #1196
Why is this type of spam not caught?
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:23:26 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1195
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:13:06 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1194
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:51:01 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1193
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:03:05 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1192
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:03:34 -0500
Chris Ross <[email protected]> • #1191
Re: problem with large PBL databases
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:29:12 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1190
Re: problem with large PBL databases
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:15:45 -0700
Mark Costlow <[email protected]> • #1189
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:42:23 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1188
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:35:23 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1187
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:21:14 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1186
problem with large PBL databases
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:12:13 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1185
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:09:18 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1184
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:53:56 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1183
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:42:22 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1182
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:21:06 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1181
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:11:47 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1180
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:00:25 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1179
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:49:31 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1178
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:06:56 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1177
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:13:40 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1176
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:00:44 -0500
Phil Hord <[email protected]> • #1175
Re: negative correlation in spamprobe?
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:46:35 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1174
negative correlation in spamprobe?
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:25:55 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1173
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioend consistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:40:51 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1172
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:00:56 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1171
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:56:36 -0500
John Hinton <webmaster-VSu8CHwuV/[email protected]> • #1170
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:46:08 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1169
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:30:48 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1168
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:06:56 -0500
John Hinton <webmaster-VSu8CHwuV/[email protected]> • #1167
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioend consistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:05:51 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1166
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:04:24 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1165
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:56:59 +0100
Thomas Schürger <[email protected]> • #1164
Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:42:07 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1163
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.