gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general archive

381 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: my solution to image spam (previously mentioendconsistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:01:15 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1162
my solution to image spam (previously mentioend consistant failures)
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:53:50 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1161
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:57:34 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1160
Re: Comparing to Google
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:08:45 -0500
Phil Hord <[email protected]> • #1159
Re: Comparing to Google
Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:47:26 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1158
Comparing to Google
Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:08:36 -0600
Graham Toal <[email protected]> • #1157
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:23:04 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1156
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:57:28 -0600
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1155
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:32:12 -0500
Phil Hord <[email protected]> • #1154
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:25:43 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1153
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:32:22 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1152
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:40:39 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1151
Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:28:55 -0500
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1150
Re: 1.4b broke PBL database
Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:18:55 +0000
"Gino Ruopolo" <[email protected]> • #1149
Re: 1.4b broke PBL database
Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:17:15 -0400
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1148
1.4b broke PBL database
Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:06:11 +0000
"Gino Ruopolo" <[email protected]> • #1147
Spam Consulting Opportunity
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:31:57 -0600
Craig Steffler <[email protected]> • #1146
consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:17:50 -0400
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1145
Re: Spamprobe in an ISP environment
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:25:10 -0400
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1144
Training Spamprobe automatically
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:54:31 +0300
Ossi Herrala <[email protected]> • #1143
Spamprobe in an ISP environment
Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:17:13 -0400 (EDT)
Raj Goel <[email protected]> • #1142
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - InterestingnessvsHo-hum Boring
Thu, 06 Jul 2006 08:39:53 +1200 (NZST)
John Carter <[email protected]> • #1141
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Sun, 02 Jul 2006 01:24:22 -0400
Bob George <mailings02-BoJ/[email protected]> • #1140
Re: SpamProbe hangs indefinitely
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:44:15 -0400
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1139
Re: SpamProbe hangs indefinitely
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:06:12 +0200
Alexander Klink <alexander-fHzCFI6gRplBDLzU/[email protected]> • #1138
Re: SpamProbe hangs indefinitely
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:14:25 -0500
"David Lee" <[email protected]> • #1137
SpamProbe hangs indefinitely
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:59:55 +0200
Alexander Klink <alexander-fHzCFI6gRplBDLzU/[email protected]> • #1136
Re: gateway/relay
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:45:41 +0200
Paul <[email protected]> • #1135
gateway/relay
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:31:32 -0300
"glaucius junior" <[email protected]> • #1134
Re: Updating to Libgif from Libungif?
Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:09:17 -0400
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1132
Updating to Libgif from Libungif?
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:26:10 -0700
John Lawless <[email protected]> • #1131
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:34:08 +0100
Jack Bertram <[email protected]> • #1130
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:53:31 -0400
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1129
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vsHo-hum Boring
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:50:02 -0400
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1128
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 09:42:48 +0200
Christian Ebert <[email protected]> • #1127
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vsHo-hum Boring
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:57:25 -0500
"David Lee" <[email protected]> • #1126
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 02:48:10 +0300
Ossi Herrala <[email protected]> • #1125
Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 19:10:55 -0400
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] • #1124
A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:52:56 +1200 (NZST)
John Carter <[email protected]> • #1123
Re: Maybe my SP is not see the DB
Wed, 24 May 2006 10:12:47 -0400
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1122
Re: Maybe my SP is not see the DB
Tue, 23 May 2006 16:51:34 -0700
Kyle Sorensen <[email protected]> • #1121
Re: Maybe my SP is not see the DB
Tue, 23 May 2006 17:37:07 -0500
"David Lee" <[email protected]> • #1120
Re: Maybe my SP is not see the DB
Tue, 23 May 2006 18:08:15 -0400
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1119
Maybe my SP is not see the DB
Tue, 23 May 2006 13:30:39 -0700
Kyle Sorensen <[email protected]> • #1118
sp as an AV fallback :-)
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:16:59 -0500
Graham Toal <[email protected]> • #1117
Re: make error w/ 1.4b
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:05:39 +0530
"Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri." <lists-fJ7H3Y/[email protected]> • #1115
Re: make error w/ 1.4b
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:50:38 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1114
Re: make error w/ 1.4b
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:40:48 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1113
Re: make error w/ 1.4b
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:24:25 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1112
make error w/ 1.4b
Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:42:24 +0530
"Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri." <lists-fJ7H3Y/[email protected]> • #1111
Re: Handling images
Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:19:21 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1110
Re: zero count tokens in decision matrix
Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:17:44 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1109
Handling images
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 23:12:05 -0600
Patrick Draper <[email protected]> • #1108
zero count tokens in decision matrix
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 23:07:05 -0600
"k b" <[email protected]> • #1107
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:11:34 -0500
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1106
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:06:51 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1105
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:03:10 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1104
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:54:21 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1103
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Sat, 4 Mar 2006 18:07:05 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1102
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:06:34 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1101
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:38:52 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1100
Re: SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:29:49 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1099
SpamProbe and gif-Mails
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:25:47 +0100 (CET)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[email protected]> • #1098
Re: life without libungif
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:58:16 -0700
hideo <hideo-H46L8g/[email protected]> • #1097
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:45:40 -0600
Graham Toal <[email protected]> • #1096
Re: life without libungif
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:10:01 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1095
Re: life without libungif
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:02:45 -0500
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1094
life without libungif
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:59:24 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1093
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:52:52 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1092
Re: Review of bayesian spam filters
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:45 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1091
Re: Review of bayesian spam filters
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:22:51 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1090
Re: Review of bayesian spam filters
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:24:51 +0000
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> • #1089
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:09:01 -0500
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]> • #1088
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:07:53 -0600
Graham Toal <[email protected]> • #1087
Review of bayesian spam filters
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:22:59 +0100
Nicolas Duboc <[email protected]> • #1086
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:30:49 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1085
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:14:10 +0100
Thomas Schürger <[email protected]> • #1084
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:46:30 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1083
Re: Scoring empty mails works fine in 1.4b
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:57:39 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1082
Scoring empty mails works fine in 1.4b
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:18:33 +0100
Thomas Schürger <[email protected]> • #1081
Re: Spamprobe -D option
Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:46:40 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1080
Re: Spamprobe -D option
Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:23:18 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1079
Re: Spamprobe -D option
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:40:58 GMT
Mark Costlow <[email protected]> • #1078
Re: Spamprobe -D option
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:55:39 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1077
Spamprobe -D option
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:26:15 GMT
Mark Costlow <[email protected]> • #1076
Re: spamprobe-1.4b released
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:14:58 +0100
Paul <[email protected]> • #1075
Re: Re: Empty message apparently not tokenized
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:38:41 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1074
Fun with undocument scoring options
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:47:19 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1073
Re: Re: Empty message apparently not tokenized
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:41:38 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1072
Re: Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:29:45 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1071
Re: Re: Empty message apparently not tokenized
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:21:28 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1070
spamprobe-1.4b released
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:18:26 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1069
Re: Re: Empty message apparently not tokenized
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:19:19 -0500
"Jem" <[email protected]> • #1068
Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:15:02 -0800
David Rosen <[email protected]> • #1067
Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:52:01 -0800
David Rosen <[email protected]> • #1066
Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:43:05 -0800
David Rosen <[email protected]> • #1065
Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:21:55 -0800
David Rosen <[email protected]> • #1064
Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:08:40 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> • #1063
Re: Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:47:21 -0500
Chris Ross <[email protected]> • #1062
Error (signal 11) during auto-train
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:49:11 -0800
David Rosen <[email protected]> • #1061
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.