gmane.games.devel.general archive

363 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Totally Safe lock-free FIFO for arbitrary-sized items.
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:25:52 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1740
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:36:07 -0700
George Warner <[email protected]> • #1739
Re: API for enabling TV out ?
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:50:08 +0200
Alen Ladavac <[email protected]> • #1738
API for enabling TV out ?
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:54:09 +0100
Jason Rennie <[email protected]> • #1737
Re: Totally Safe lock-free FIFO for arbitrary-sized items.
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:35:28 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1736
Re: Totally Safe lock-free FIFO for arbitrary-sized items.
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:44:37 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1735
Re: Totally Safe lock-free FIFO for arbitrary-sized items.
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:13 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1734
Re: Totally Safe lock-free FIFO for arbitrary-sized items.
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:20:53 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1733
Re: Totally Safe lock-free FIFO for arbitrary-sized items.
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:34:21 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1732
Totally Safe lock-free FIFO for arbitrary-sized items.
Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:10:50 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1731
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:53:19 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1730
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:54:09 +0200
"Ola Olsson" <[email protected]> • #1729
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:26:20 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1728
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 23:01:09 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1727
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:18:51 -0700
Martin Donlon <[email protected]> • #1726
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:34:52 -0400
"Daniel Vogel" <[email protected]> • #1725
Re: cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:29:10 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1724
cross platform 64bit lock free FIFO?
Sat, 05 Aug 2006 10:02:36 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1723
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:53:34 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1722
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:01:11 +0200
"Stefan Boberg" <[email protected]> • #1721
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:47:31 +0100
"Chris Chapman" <[email protected]> • #1720
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:26:36 +0100
"Chris Chapman" <[email protected]> • #1719
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:38:41 +0200
Alen Ladavac <[email protected]> • #1718
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:27:48 +0200
"Carsten Orthbandt" <[email protected]> • #1717
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:08:46 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1716
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:08:44 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1715
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:32:40 -0700
"Noel Llopis" <[email protected]> • #1714
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:29:34 -0600
"Megan Fox" <[email protected]> • #1713
Re: problems while debugger is attached
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:18:10 +0100
"Chris Chapman" <[email protected]> • #1712
problems while debugger is attached
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:49:09 -0600
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1711
Re: OpenGl lists
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:46:28 +0200
Sylvain Vignaud <[email protected]> • #1710
OpenGl lists
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:17:49 +0800
"Research" <[email protected]> • #1709
Re: [Algorithms] C style math libraries versus "proper" C++ maths
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:34:28 +0100
"Richard Fabian" <[email protected]> • #1708
Re: C style math libraries versus "proper" C++ maths
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:15:57 +0100
"Richard Fabian" <[email protected]> • #1707
Re: C style math libraries versus "proper" C++ maths
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:42:52 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1706
Re: RE: [Algorithms] C style math libraries versus "proper" C++ maths
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:26:53 +0100
"Scoubidou944 (Hotmail)" <[email protected]> • #1705
Re: C style math libraries versus "proper" C++ maths
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:26:10 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1704
RE: [Algorithms] C style math libraries versus "proper" C++ maths
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:00:55 -0800
"Stephane Etienne" <[email protected]> • #1703
Re: Re: [Algorithms] Colada experience (was Animation Export Problem)
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:39:38 +0000
"Richard Fabian" <[email protected]> • #1702
Re: [Algorithms] Colada experience (was Animation Export Problem)
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:48:33 -0600
Patrick Doane <[email protected]> • #1701
Re: [Algorithms] Colada experience (was Animation Export Problem)
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:28:18 -0800
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1700
Re: arialuni.ttf licensing
Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:27:56 -0800
Richard Mitton <[email protected]> • #1699
arialuni.ttf licensing
Sat, 4 Feb 2006 00:42:25 +0200
Ivan-Assen Ivanov <[email protected]> • #1698
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:52:23 -0800
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1697
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:03:42 +0000
Ash Henstock <[email protected]> • #1696
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 20:18:22 +0000
Ash Henstock <[email protected]> • #1695
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:04:35 -0700
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1694
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:36:48 -0700
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1693
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:50:46 -0800
Jim Tilander <[email protected]> • #1692
Re: SPAM Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:47:44 -0800
Peter <[email protected]> • #1691
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:26:09 -0700
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1690
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:19:40 -0800
Jim Tilander <[email protected]> • #1689
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:38:37 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1688
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:58:40 -0700
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1687
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:15:54 +0000
Ash Henstock <[email protected]> • #1686
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:50:53 -0700
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1685
Re: ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:49:02 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1684
Re: SPAM ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:32:28 -0800
Peter <[email protected]> • #1683
ieee754 -0.0f?
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:50:00 -0700
"Andras Balogh" <[email protected]> • #1682
Re: scripting via COM?
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:10:23 -0800
Chad Austin <[email protected]> • #1681
Re: scripting via COM?
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:16:19 -0500
Kent Quirk <[email protected]> • #1680
Re: scripting via COM?
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:34:36 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1679
Re: scripting via COM?
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:00:36 +0000
brian sharon <[email protected]> • #1678
Re: scripting via COM?
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:07:45 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1677
Re: scripting via COM?
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:44:53 -0800
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1676
Re: scripting via COM?
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:13:37 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1675
scripting via COM?
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:09:45 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1674
CATRuntime and animation engine
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:46:23 +0800
"jason zhang" <[email protected]> • #1673
Re: Was: FreeType
Sat, 07 Jan 2006 23:33:11 +0100
Balogh Péter <[email protected]> • #1672
RE: FreeType
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 00:45:05 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1671
RE: FreeType
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:10:45 -0800
"Nick Trout" <[email protected]> • #1670
Re: FreeType
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 00:05:10 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1669
Re: FreeType
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:11:53 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1668
Re: FreeType
Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:11:25 -0800
Chad Austin <[email protected]> • #1667
RE: FreeType
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:12:41 -0800
"Ignacio Castano" <[email protected]> • #1666
Re: FreeType
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 02:16:48 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1665
Re: FreeType
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:15:35 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1664
Re: FreeType
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:16:48 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1663
Re: FreeType
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:50:57 +0000
Ash Henstock <[email protected]> • #1662
Re: FreeType
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:34:41 +0200
Ivan-Assen Ivanov <[email protected]> • #1661
Re: FreeType
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 00:58:59 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1660
Re: FreeType
Sun, 1 Jan 2006 22:13:15 -0700
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1659
Re: FreeType
Sun, 1 Jan 2006 23:03:41 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1658
Re: Is anybody using CgFX?
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:40:30 -0700
Mike Wuetherick <[email protected]> • #1657
Re: Is anybody using CgFX?
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 20:32:20 -0700
Noel Llopis <[email protected]> • #1656
Re: Is anybody using CgFX?
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 17:24:43 -0700
Ignacio Castaño <[email protected]> • #1655
Is anybody using CgFX?
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 08:59:49 -0700
Noel Llopis <[email protected]> • #1654
gamma ramp
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:15:30 +0200
[email protected] • #1653
Re: responsive threading
Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:12:49 -0600
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1652
Re: responsive threading
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:23:18 -0600
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1651
Re: responsive threading
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:13:01 -0600
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1650
Re: responsive threading
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:44:17 +0300
Ivan-Assen Ivanov <[email protected]> • #1649
Re: responsive threading
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:51:32 -0400
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #1648
Re: responsive threading
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:49:46 -0000
"Alen Ladavac" <[email protected]> • #1647
Re: responsive threading
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:51:20 -0600
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1646
Re: responsive threading
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:15:00 -0600
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1645
Re: responsive threading
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:40:15 -0000
"Alen Ladavac" <[email protected]> • #1644
Re: responsive threading
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:48:48 -0700
Beau Albiston <[email protected]> • #1643
Re: responsive threading
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:06:39 -0600
Andras Balogh <[email protected]> • #1642
RE: responsive threading
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:18 -0700
"Mat Noguchi (BUNGIE)" <[email protected]> • #1641
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.