gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gkrellm archive

394 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

gpu core temp readout problem
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:54:22 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1621
Re: Suppress Automatic Grid Scaling?
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:11:16 -0500
Patrice Levesque <[email protected]> • #1620
Re: Suppress Automatic Grid Scaling?
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:08:25 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1619
Re: Suppress Automatic Grid Scaling?
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:10:53 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1618
Suppress Automatic Grid Scaling?
Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:36:05 -0800
Walt Bilofsky <[email protected]> • #1617
Re: New User Question
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:05:17 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1616
New User Question
Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:55:29 -0800
Walt Bilofsky <[email protected]> • #1615
Re: Re running gkrellm-2.3.5-win64-setup.exe on Winxp x64
Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:17:47 +0100
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1614
RE: Re running gkrellm-2.3.5-win64-setup.exe on Winxp x64
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:08:41 +1100
Daniel Walton <[email protected]> • #1613
Re: Re running gkrellm-2.3.5-win64-setup.exe on Winxp x64
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:52:42 +0100
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1612
Re running gkrellm-2.3.5-win64-setup.exe on Winxp x64
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:15:05 +1100
Daniel Walton <[email protected]> • #1611
Re: I Don't Understand Trayicons
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:49:55 -0500
Dale Smith <[email protected]> • #1610
I Don't Understand Trayicons
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:25:54 +0000
Mark Williams <[email protected]> • #1609
Re: GTK+ 3 vs GKrellM public API
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:05:10 +0200
Jindřich Makovička <[email protected]> • #1608
Re: GTK+ 3 vs GKrellM public API
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:01:02 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1607
Re: GTK+ 3 vs GKrellM public API
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:15:34 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1606
GTK+ 3 vs GKrellM public API
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:48:31 +0200
Jindřich Makovička <[email protected]> • #1605
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:02:41 +0200
Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> • #1604
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows (thanks for the new version)
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:59:44 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1603
[Announce]: GKrellM 2.3.5 for Windows
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:31:33 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1602
GKrellM 2.3.5
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:49:53 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1601
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:23:26 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1600
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:16:56 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1599
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:41:04 -0400
Rio <[email protected]> • #1598
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:34:29 -0400
Rio <[email protected]> • #1597
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:49:14 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1596
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:23:12 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1595
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:53:14 -0400
Dennis Nezic <[email protected]> • #1594
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:30:05 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1593
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:36:09 -0400
Dennis Nezic <[email protected]> • #1592
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:36:44 -0400
Dennis Nezic <[email protected]> • #1591
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:13:37 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1590
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:53:18 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1589
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:44:13 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1588
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:36:19 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1587
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:38:41 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1586
Re: Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:23:24 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1585
Two questions for gkrellm on windows
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:26:47 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1584
Re: CPU temperature thermal
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:46:40 -0400
Dennis Nezic <[email protected]> • #1583
CPU temperature thermal
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:07:19 -0400
Dennis Nezic <[email protected]> • #1582
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:55:22 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1581
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:38:51 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1580
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:32:43 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1579
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:05:41 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1578
[Announce] IPv6 support in multiping plugin
Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:05:01 +0200
Jindřich Makovička <[email protected]> • #1577
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:16:31 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1576
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:14:30 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1575
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:18:26 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1574
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:10:59 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1573
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:06:08 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1572
Re: new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:52:39 -0500
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1571
new attempt to solve an old problem with gkrellmsss
Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:40:51 -0400
Jack <[email protected]> • #1570
Re: Q: does GKrellM-Win32 use Ms. Vis. C++ runtime?
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:41:48 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1569
suggestion for viewing CPU load
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:33:27 -0500
Glen Mabey <[email protected]> • #1568
Q: does GKrellM-Win32 use Ms. Vis. C++ runtime?
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:08:18 -0400
GEORGE BARRICK <[email protected]> • #1567
[patch] fix aliasing warnings
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:17:48 +0200
Jindřich Makovička <[email protected]> • #1566
Re: gkrellm vs asus mobo's
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:41:09 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1565
Re: no disk activity on os x
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:54:41 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1564
Re: no disk activity on os x
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:51:14 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1563
Re: no disk activity on os x
Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:44:10 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1562
[Announce]: gkrellm 2.3.4 win32/win64 beta for testing
Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:56:28 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1561
no disk activity on os x
Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:49:53 -0500
"R. Kuehn" <[email protected]> • #1560
Re: for suggestion box?
Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:55:19 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1559
Re: gkrellm vs asus mobo's
Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:49:45 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1558
Re: Re: Bug#574389: gkrellm: Information in sensor-config file is lost after power outage
Sat, 05 Jun 2010 00:22:51 +0200
Stefan Gehn <[email protected]> • #1557
gkrellm vs asus mobo's
Thu, 13 May 2010 23:36:34 -0400
Gene Heskett <[email protected]> • #1556
Re: Bug#577252: Spanish PO file update
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:07:40 +0200
Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> • #1555
Re: Bug#574389: gkrellm: Information in sensor-config file is lost after power outage
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:46:22 +0100
Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> • #1554
Re: Bug#574552: Disabled net interface does not remain disabled
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:45:49 +0100
Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> • #1553
for suggestion box?
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:02:59 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1552
instant monitor
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:19:03 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1551
Re: cpu temp polling
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:30:53 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1550
Re: cpu temp polling
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:35 -0300
Leandro Penz <[email protected]> • #1549
cpu temp polling
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:01:58 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1548
hddtemp question
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:01:03 +0100
Achim Theobald <[email protected]> • #1547
sensors polling time
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:30:56 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1546
GkrellM: Request to "merge" filesystem monitor with disk usage.
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:57:07 +0100
Skotlex <[email protected]> • #1545
Re: gkrellmd question
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:00:47 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1544
Re: gkrellmd question
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:06:30 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1543
Re: gkrellmd question
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:33:33 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1542
Re: gkrellmd question
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:19:23 -0500 (EST)
"Benjamin R. Haskell" <[email protected]> • #1541
Re: gkrellmd question
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:35:51 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1540
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:50:01 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1539
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:49:09 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1538
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:42:03 -0600
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1537
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:18:35 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1536
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:44:02 -0600
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1535
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:33:35 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1534
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:20:47 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1533
Re: gkrellmd question
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:10:05 -0600
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1532
Re: gkrellmd question
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:47:02 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1531
Re: gkrellmd question
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:03:35 -0600
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1530
Re: gkrellmd question
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:17:41 -0500
Rio <[email protected]> • #1529
Re: gkrellmd question
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:24 -0600
Bill Wilson <[email protected]> • #1528
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.