gmane.org.user-groups.slug.chat archive

531 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:51:00 +1100
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #7283
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:07:57 +1100
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7282
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:07:09 +1100
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7281
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:29:58 +1100
Ken Foskey <[email protected]> • #7280
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:49:30 +0100
Lindsay Holmwood <[email protected]> • #7279
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:24:39 +1100
Erik de Castro Lopo <[email protected]> • #7278
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:17:39 +1100
invisible ink <[email protected]> • #7277
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:15:45 +1100
James Polley <[email protected]> • #7276
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:00:25 +1100
James Polley <[email protected]> • #7275
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:43:37 +1100
Erik de Castro Lopo <[email protected]> • #7274
Re: Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:35:13 +1100
Andrew Perry <[email protected]> • #7273
Crazy talk: migrate to Google Apps?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:27:28 +1100
James Polley <[email protected]> • #7272
Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:54:06 +1100
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7271
Re: Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:03:04 +1100
david <[email protected]> • #7270
Re: Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:05:23 +1030
Piers Rowan <[email protected]> • #7269
Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:38:37 +1100
Ken Foskey <[email protected]> • #7268
Re: Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:33:33 +1100
Ranty McRanterson <[email protected]> • #7267
Re: Test for potential programmer
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Carlo Sogono <[email protected]> • #7266
Re: Test for potential programmer
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:19:32 -0800
Jamie Powell <[email protected]> • #7265
Re: Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:11:59 +1100
Ranty McRanterson <[email protected]> • #7264
Re: Test for potential programmer
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Carlo Sogono <[email protected]> • #7263
Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:55:33 +1030
Piers Rowan <[email protected]> • #7262
Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:44:03 +1100
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7261
Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:51:36 +1100
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7260
Re: Test for potential programmer
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:07:29 +1100
Ken Foskey <[email protected]> • #7259
Test for potential programmer
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Carlo Sogono <[email protected]> • #7258
networked game sites in city needed
Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:02:37 +1100
Ken Foskey <[email protected]> • #7257
3g networks AUS and o/s
Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:57:38 +1100 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7256
Re: slug-chat Digest, Vol 45, Issue 2
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:26:27 +1100
elliott-brennan <[email protected]> • #7255
WEB PAGES FOR LINUX DRIVERS
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:55:57 +1100
ANDREW BARRETT <[email protected]> • #7254
Re: piratebay blocked by Telstra ?
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:24:41 +1100 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7253
Re: piratebay blocked by Telstra ?
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:07:16 +1100
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7252
Re: piratebay blocked by Telstra ?
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:00:28 +1100
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #7251
Re: piratebay blocked by Telstra ?
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:04:33 +1100
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7250
piratebay blocked by Telstra ?
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:44:04 +1100 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7249
how not to do a launch party
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:37:53 +1100
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7248
Re: mini USB 5p socket source?
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:55:56 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7247
Re: mini USB 5p socket source?
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:18:01 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7246
Re: mini USB 5p socket source?
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:34:17 +1000
Matthew Hannigan <[email protected]> • #7245
mini USB 5p socket source?
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:32:26 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7244
Lost mp3 player at second-last slug meeting?
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:39:43 +1000
James Polley <[email protected]> • #7243
Re: [chat] STUDENTS can have Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30, Microsoft has announced
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:07:16 +1000
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7242
Re: STUDENTS can hav e Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30 , Microsoft has announced
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:37:28 +1000
Andrew Bennetts <[email protected]> • #7241
Re: STUDENTS can have Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30, Microsoft has announced
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:59:53 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7240
Re: [chat] STUDENTS can have Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30, Microsoft has announced
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:50:20 +1000
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7239
Re: STUDENTS can hav e Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30 , Microsoft has announced
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:22:21 +1000
invisible ink <[email protected]> • #7238
Re: STUDENTS can have Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30, Microsoft has announced
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:11:58 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7237
Re: STUDENTS can hav e Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30 , Microsoft has announced
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:40:45 +1000
invisible ink <[email protected]> • #7236
Re: [chat] STUDENTS can have Win 7 for a reduced fee of £30, Microsoft has announced
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:01:06 +1000
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7235
STUDENTS can have Win 7 for a reduced fee of £3 0, Microsoft has announced
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:31:35 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7234
Updating my calendar-Pls Share ur few valuable mins
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:40:03 +0000
"Sundar Sakthivel" <[email protected]> • #7233
Reminder from animal-lib.org.au
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (animallib) • #7232
Re: Search for a star
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:58:02 +1000
Sridhar Dhanapalan <[email protected]> • #7231
Re: Search for a star
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:48:38 +0100
Pete Ryland <[email protected]> • #7230
Re: Search for a star
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:20:53 +1000
Blindraven <[email protected]> • #7229
Re: Search for a star
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:12:39 +1000
Andrew Bennetts <[email protected]> • #7228
Re: Search for a star
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:28:23 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7227
Re: Search for a star
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:54:19 +1000
Andrew Bennetts <[email protected]> • #7226
Re: Search for a star
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:30:23 +1000
Mike Lake <[email protected]> • #7225
Search for a star
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:41:22 +1000
"Simon Thomas" <[email protected]> • #7224
Meeting- Shooters' Bill, Meeting- Councils to Ban Caged Eggs
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Animal Liberation <[email protected]> • #7223
DPP blasts net censor plan
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:44:52 +1000
elliott-brennan <[email protected]> • #7222
Re: ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:52:49 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7221
Re: ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:52:52 +1000
Morgan Storey <[email protected]> • #7220
Re: ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:39:57 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7219
Re: ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:31:25 +0800
Andrew Perry <[email protected]> • #7218
Re: ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:24:41 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7217
Re: ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:58:06 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7216
Re: ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:22:26 +0800
Andrew Perry <[email protected]> • #7215
ADSL provisioning Q
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:01:51 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7214
Re: [activities] Re: [SLUG-ANNOUNCE] July SLUG meeting - Friday July 31, 2009
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:01:47 +1000
James Polley <[email protected]> • #7213
Re: blackberry and squirrelmail
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:35:53 +1000
david <[email protected]> • #7212
Re: blackberry and squirrelmail
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:29:00 +1000
Philip Rhoades <[email protected]> • #7211
Re: Re: blackberry and squirrelmail
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:36:58 +1000
david <[email protected]> • #7210
Re: blackberry and squirrelmail
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:23:41 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7209
Re: blackberry and squirrelmail
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:48:49 +1000
"Rob Weir" <[email protected]> • #7208
Re: blackberry and squirrelmail
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:45:19 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7207
blackberry and squirrelmail
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:34:41 +1000
david <[email protected]> • #7206
Re: CD boot OK, DVD boot fails ?
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:13:52 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7205
Re: CD boot OK, DVD boot fails ?
Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:24:58 +1000
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #7204
CD boot OK, DVD boot fails ?
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:04:00 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7203
Re: Re: 64bit hardware suggestions?
Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:42:26 +1000
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #7202
RE: bandwith control on a LAN?
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:43:16 +1000
"Minh Van Le" <[email protected]> • #7201
Re: digitizing audio cassettes
Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:39:19 +1000
Ken Wilson <[email protected]> • #7200
Re: 64bit hardware suggestions? - again . .
Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:43:16 +1000
Philip Rhoades <[email protected]> • #7199
Various computer books for sale
Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Carlo Sogono <[email protected]> • #7198
Re: digitizing audio cassettes
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:35:55 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7197
Re: cf as a ssd ?
Thu, 2 Jul 2009 07:57:38 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7196
digitizing audio cassettes
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 7:38:10 +1000
Voytek Eymont <[email protected]> • #7195
Re: 64bit hardware suggestions?
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:46:48 +1000
Sridhar Dhanapalan <[email protected]> • #7194
Re: 64bit hardware suggestions?
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:44:25 +1000
Sridhar Dhanapalan <[email protected]> • #7193
Re: cf as a ssd ?
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:12:58 +1000
Paul Robinson <[email protected]> • #7192
Re: cf as a ssd ?
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:57:05 +1000
Paul Robinson <[email protected]> • #7191
Re: cf as a ssd ?
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:18:42 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7190
Re: cf as a ssd ?
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:47:52 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7189
Re: cf as a ssd ?
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:36:15 +1000 (EST)
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> • #7188
Re: 64bit hardware suggestions?
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:05:44 +1000
Philip Rhoades <[email protected]> • #7187
Re: 64bit hardware suggestions?
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:29:58 +1000
Sridhar Dhanapalan <[email protected]> • #7186
Re: cf as a ssd ?
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:15:23 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7185
Re: 64bit hardware suggestions?
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:12:42 +1000
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> • #7184
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.