gmane.recreation.radio.hardware.yaesu.vr-500 archive

534 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 6). Latest articles →

No battery bar at all!!!!!
Sun, 24 May 2009 22:40:32 -0000
"qantas7472003" <[email protected]> • #1353
Re: only one battery bar
Thu, 21 May 2009 23:43:20 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1352
Re: only one battery bar
Thu, 21 May 2009 15:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Florence Vignati <[email protected]> • #1351
Re: only one battery bar
Thu, 21 May 2009 07:19:55 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1350
only one battery bar
Wed, 20 May 2009 16:23:34 -0000
"kj4fgi" <[email protected]> • #1349
VR-500 interface cable for PC schematic??
Wed, 20 May 2009 19:03:02 -0000
"seroj_varnesian" <[email protected]> • #1348
Yaesu VR-500 Scanner! Mint.
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:12:15 -0000
"Al" <[email protected]> • #1347
Re: vr 500 discriminator
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:30:44 -0000
"paul" <[email protected]> • #1346
Re: vr 500 discriminator
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:38:26 -0500
dan wanchic <[email protected]> • #1345
VR500 for sale
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:18:14 -0400
"Richard" <[email protected]> • #1344
vr 500 discriminator
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:08:10 -0000
"paul" <[email protected]> • #1343
Re: Re: Where the hell is it?
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:52:38 -0400
"Richard Amirault" <[email protected]> • #1342
Re: Re: Where the hell is it?
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:21:03 -0500
[email protected] • #1341
Re: Where the hell is it?
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:39:40 -0000
"k7wce" <[email protected]> • #1340
VR500 for sale
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:51:06 -0400
"Richard" <[email protected]> • #1339
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:28:17 -0400
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #1338
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:13:58 -0400
ed <[email protected]> • #1337
Re: Where the hell is it?
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:06:58 -0500
[email protected] • #1336
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:58:29 -0500
[email protected] • #1335
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:22:03 -0500
[email protected] • #1334
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:46:53 -0400
"William S. White" <[email protected]> • #1333
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:50:53 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1332
Where the hell is it?
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:47:57 -0400
"Richard Amirault" <[email protected]> • #1331
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:40:22 -0500
Mike Lehman <[email protected]> • #1330
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:51:09 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1329
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:42:56 -0400
"William S. White" <[email protected]> • #1328
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:00:32 -0500
[email protected] • #1327
VR500 for sale
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:52:41 -0400
"Richard" <[email protected]> • #1326
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:22:37 -0400
ed <[email protected]> • #1325
Re: Re: New member, VR-500 arrives!
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:46:45 -0500
[email protected] • #1324
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:18:31 -0000
"voip10" <[email protected]> • #1323
Re: Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:41:47 -0500
[email protected] • #1322
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:52:30 -0000
"martinbradford2001" <[email protected]> • #1321
VR 500 FOR SALE
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:47:11 -0000
"ztechire" <[email protected]> • #1320
VR-500 on order!
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:24:52 -0000
"Chuck" <[email protected]> • #1319
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:54:12 -0400
Jim Miller <[email protected]> • #1318
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:52:46 -0500
[email protected] • #1317
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:44:40 -0500
[email protected] • #1316
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:48:57 -0500
[email protected] • #1315
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:46:34 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1314
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:41:57 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1313
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:51:50 -0400
ed <[email protected]> • #1312
Re: Limited HF coverage?
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:48:40 -0500
Mike Lehman <[email protected]> • #1311
Limited HF coverage?
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:33:57 -0000
"Chuck" <[email protected]> • #1310
Re: NAM capability...
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:12:35 -0500
[email protected] • #1309
Re: NAM capability...
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:08:07 -0500
Mike Lehman <[email protected]> • #1308
NAM capability...
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:30:57 -0000
"Chuck" <[email protected]> • #1307
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:32:20 -0500
[email protected] • #1306
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:42:28 -0500
[email protected] • #1305
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:13:52 -0500
Mike Lehman <[email protected]> • #1304
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:05:32 -0500
[email protected] • #1303
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:08:25 -0500
[email protected] • #1302
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:15:55 -0400
"Garry W. Watts" <[email protected]> • #1301
R: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:48:38 +0100
"Antongiulio Goracci" <[email protected]> • #1300
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:30:38 -0500
Mike Lehman <[email protected]> • #1299
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:35:11 +0000
[email protected] • #1298
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 7:39:37 -0400
<[email protected]> • #1297
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:30:58 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1296
Re: New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 01:57:57 -0400
ed <[email protected]> • #1295
New member, undecided but tempted!
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:49:36 -0000
"Chuck" <[email protected]> • #1294
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:21:31 -0000
"jzagar53" <[email protected]> • #1293
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:15:51 -0000
"stasiznsk" <[email protected]> • #1292
Re: Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:45:10 -0400
"Paul A. Pennington" <[email protected]> • #1291
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:37:51 -0000
"eckrot" <[email protected]> • #1290
Re: Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:04:33 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1289
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:10:27 -0000
"jzagar53" <[email protected]> • #1288
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:40:08 -0000
"eckrot" <[email protected]> • #1287
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:33:24 -0000
"david273129" <[email protected]> • #1286
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:20:21 +0000 (GMT)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1285
Re: Disassembly of the VR-500?
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:51:19 +0200
Ulrich Heidenreich <[email protected]> • #1284
Disassembly of the VR-500?
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:45:02 -0000
"jzagar53" <[email protected]> • #1283
Re: Band Scan problem
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:35:52 -0000
"shakennotstirred123" <[email protected]> • #1282
Re: Band Scan problem
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:23:14 -0000
"voip10" <[email protected]> • #1281
Re: Band Scan problem
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:32:46 -0000
"shakennotstirred123" <[email protected]> • #1280
Re: Band Scan problem
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:07:58 -0400
Dave <[email protected]> • #1279
Re: Band Scan problem
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:31:10 -0000
"shakennotstirred123" <[email protected]> • #1278
Band Scan problem
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:49:16 -0400
Dave <[email protected]> • #1277
Re: Funky display
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:54:36 -0000
"eeyore_pumpkin" <[email protected]> • #1276
Re: Funky display
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:52:27 -0000
"eeyore_pumpkin" <[email protected]> • #1275
Re: Re: Funky display
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:49:23 -0400
Doug Alderdice <[email protected]> • #1274
Re: Funky display
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:57:10 -0000
"eeyore_pumpkin" <[email protected]> • #1273
Re: Funky display
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:53:54 +0100 (BST)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1272
Re: Funky display
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:35:31 -0500
Mike Lehman <[email protected]> • #1271
Re: Funky display
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:50:56 -0400
Doug Alderdice <[email protected]> • #1270
Funky display
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:48:01 -0000
"eeyore_pumpkin" <[email protected]> • #1269
Re: Metro NY area
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Coach Ira <[email protected]> • #1268
Re: Metro NY area
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:09:09 -0400
"Jim" <[email protected]> • #1267
Re: Metro NY area
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Coach Ira <[email protected]> • #1266
Re: Metro NY area
Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:34:21 -0400
"Jim" <[email protected]> • #1265
Metro NY area
Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:29:19 -0000
"Ira S." <[email protected]> • #1264
Re: PRO39 and VR-500
Sat, 7 Jun 2008 19:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
David Beebe <[email protected]> • #1263
Re: PRO39 and VR-500
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:10:23 -0400
"William S. White" <[email protected]> • #1262
PRO39 and VR-500
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:06:11 -0000
"Dave" <[email protected]> • #1261
Re: Re: An Antenna Question
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:34:11 -0500
"Bob Parnass, AJ9S" <[email protected]> • #1260
Re: An Antenna Question
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:01:43 -0000
"Joe" <[email protected]> • #1259
FW: Receiver Recommendation Please
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:00:16 -0500
"Rod Bradley" <[email protected]> • #1258
RE: Receiver Recommendation Please
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:57:56 -0500
"Rod Bradley" <[email protected]> • #1257
Re: New member: Jorge from Valencia (Spain)
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:40:37 +0100 (BST)
JIM GRIFFITHS <[email protected]> • #1256
Re: Receiver Recommendation Please
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:20:51 -0400
"Richard Amirault" <[email protected]> • #1255
RE: Receiver Recommendation Please
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:09:06 -0500
"Rod Bradley" <[email protected]> • #1254
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.